Would The Old World terrain rank better as packs or individual assets?

Intent: Informational Search focus: would the old world terrain rank better as packs or individual assets?, rank and file infantry stl, movement tray stl, old world terrain Hi everyone, I'm opening this thread because I'm actively researching Would The Old World terrain rank better as packs or individual assets? and I want to make sure I'm approaching it the right way inside MakerForge. I'm mainly using the platform for rank-and-file fantasy hobbyists, and most of the search phrases I've been comparing are: would the old world terrain rank better as packs or individual assets?, rank and file infantry stl, movement tray stl, old world terrain. My current blocker is simple: rank-and-file products need very functional naming, but a lot of listings miss the obvious terms players are actually typing. I don't want a result that only looks good in a screenshot. I need something that stays strong for publishing, 3D preview, and real printing or marketplace presentation. What I'm trying to achieve is publishing Old World assets with practical names that immediately communicate table function. What I've tested so far:

A prompt written around silhouette, scale, and tabletop use case

Different naming combinations for the asset page and tags

A lighter export + preview workflow so the page still feels fast

Where I think MakerForge could help most here is with: regiment terms, movement tray phrasing, terrain pack grouping, functional listing names. If anyone has found a better workflow, I'd really appreciate a concrete example. Thanks in advance, Tristan Vickery

Hi, thanks for raising this. This is a very relevant topic for MakerForge users, especially when the goal is to connect search demand, clean asset presentation, and a result that still feels good in the viewer. For this use case, our recommendation is:

Use terms like infantry, regiment, movement tray, or filler where appropriate.

Do not hide the practical use behind lore-first wording.

Group compatible items into a set only if the buyer expects them together.

In practical terms, Old World search intent tends to reward practical product language more than cinematic naming. If you want, reply with the exact prompt, title, tags, or publishing angle you're considering and we can help refine it so it performs better both for usability and discoverability.

MakerForge Support